Beeldend kunstenaar Marlies Vermeulen en hoogleraar filosofie van de gezondheidszorg Klasien Horstman ontvangen het Mingler Scholarship 2020 voor hun project Bacteria & Borders. Experimental cartography between art, lab & (daily) life. Vermeulen en Horstman gaan vanuit sociaal, medisch, biomedisch, ethisch, antropologisch en artistiek perspectief onderzoeken hoe grenzen een rol spelen in infecties en de preventie ervan. Zij ontvangen hier 10.000 euro voor. Het Mingler Scholarship wordt mogelijk gemaakt door de Akademie van Kunsten in samenwerking met De Jonge Akademie van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen en financieel ondersteund door de Stichting Niemeijer Fonds.

Vermeulen en Horstman vertalen de onderzoeksgegevens naar een virale landkaart waarmee zij het  bewustzijn willen creeren dat reizen over landsgrenzen nooit beperkt blijft tot de reiziger alleen. Reizigers worden altijd vergezeld door stille reisgenoten zoals virussen en bacteriën. Deze micro-organismen houden zich niet aan de officiële landsgrenzen en verspreiden zich over de hele wereld met risico’s voor de wereldwijde volksgezondheid zoals nu te zien is in de Coronacrisis.

De beoordelingscommissie, onder leiding van Micha Hamel (dichter, componist, onderzoeker en lid van de Akademie van Kunsten), prees Vermeulen en Horstman voor de goede inbedding van het artistieke onderzoek in de wetenschappelijke disciplines en vice versa. Het project heeft daarnaast - gezien de Coronacrisis - een grote relevantie. Ook vindt de commissie alternatieve cartografie een krachtig medium om het grensoverschrijdende karakter van virussen zichtbaar te maken.

Redrawing borders

Professor of Philosophy of Public Health Klasien Horstman and Belgian artist Marlies Vermeulen have won this year’s Mingler Scholarship for their project Bacteria & Borders. Experimental cartography between art, lab & (daily) life. They plan to study and make tangible the realities of infectious diseases in border regions.

“It feels quite liberating, as though it invites illegal activity – national authority seems very far away,” says Klasien Horstman about growing up close to the German border, in the Northern part of the Netherlands. This notion of borders and transgression has stayed with her. She’s become a philosopher working across disciplines and studying public health, a field which in itself has to grapple with the blurred borders between medical expertise, clinical realities, socio-economic processes, cultural repertoires, and so much more.

Five years ago, Maastricht University's Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI) established a collaboration between researchers from the humanities, social sciences, law, medical microbiology and infectious diseases prevention with a shared commitment to the public character of health, rather than just the purely clinical aspect. In this transdisciplinary environment, Horstman focuses on the sociocultural dimension of disease control.

Crossing the t’s and borders

Transdisciplinary research is a ubiquitous buzzword, but it takes hard work and a great deal of openness and curiosity to make it work properly. “It took us three years to understand each other,” laughs Horstman. “We’re trying to investigate the role of individual behaviour, involvement of the state, the democratic legitimation of top-down prevention strategies, etc. – and we generate recommendations how to get citizens involved in the process.”

Given her background and the degree of mobility between Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany around Maastricht, Horstman quickly became interested in the spread of infectious disease in border regions. “Bacteria and viruses don’t care about borders – but in a way they do! My colleagues showed that an outbreak of the zoonotic Q Fever with thousands of cases in the Netherlands led to mass cull of livestock – but there was no outbreak in Germany, even though it happened very close to the border.”

Covid-19 is the wheezing elephant in the room, especially in a city as international and defined by borders as Maastricht. “States respond differently – and the impact is most clearly observable in border regions. In Germany, you have to wear a facemask in shops, in the Netherlands you don’t. That means that Germany might be safer, but it definitely means that Germans come to Maastricht to shop without the inconvenience of having to wear a facemask…”

So, can different national approaches explain different mortality rates? “Of course, closing borders and containment measures make a difference. At the same time, Germany has massively tested people and therefore got many positives back from young people who didn’t develop

Constructive Constructivism

What researchers can find depends on what they are looking for how and where. “Of course, bacteria and viruses and their effects on tissues are real,” Horstman explains. “At the same time, I believe that we construct the reality of diseases.” The way we define and investigate disease is deeply intermingled with the paradigms and technologies we use to do that.  

This view avoids dichotomies between culture and biology (or body and mind, for that matter). It may be hard to see how this applies to ‘biological facts’ such as bacteria and viruses, and, as Horstman notes, “people find that approach more plausible in softer medicalised concepts such as, say, attention deficit disorder or depression. But is does apply to viruses and bacteria as well.”

Since science is so deeply intertwined with culture, “we need more anthropologists and sociologists in disease control!” Horstman naturally has a vested interest here – but studying the ‘cultures of science’ can have far-reaching practical ramifications: “Medical microbiologists in the hospital had developed a test for antimicrobial resistance that was 14 hours faster, but clinicians didn’t use it. They asked us to look at it, so we conducted interviews and observational studies.”

It turned out that the test results became available an hour before the end of their shifts; therefore practitioners were reluctant to change patients’ antibiotics regimes without being able to monitor the effects personally. “There were other factors too, like the nondescript name of the test, but it was basically a case of the fifth floor not understanding how the fourth floor works and thinks.”

Horstman studies – and communicates to scientists and practitioners – the biosocial complexities of healthcare practices. Which is by no means an invitation to relativism: “There are more and less clever ways of dealing with these complexities… Some measures work better than others, but it is really important to take the constructed character of disease realities into account, as this also points to our own responsibility for the landscape of health and diseases, including  the epidemics that we are confronted with.”

Mapping up the border cases

BioSocial complexities are multiplied in border regions. In Bacteria & Borders, Horstman and cartography artist Marlies Vermeulen will try to understand how borders help or hamper disease control measures in the Belgian-Dutch-German border region. They will conduct ethnographic and statistical research into the flow of people, vaccination patterns, and the spread of infectious diseases.

“It might very well be that national borders play no role at all. Maps of the spread of diseases usually show a national average and stop at the border. That doesn’t reflect the multiple realities of these border regions.” Therefore, Vermeulen will translate those empirical findings into a cartographic art. “An artistic experience might help epidemiologists, and people in general, to rethink how borders and infectious disease control work.” Horstman and Vermeulen have been awarded the Mingler Scholarship 2020. “We’ve been working in this direction for quite a while. It has always been very relevant for border regions – but the pandemic certainly has made it even more. Collaboration between science and arts on this subject is very exciting and inspiring.”